The New York Times’ 9/11 Propaganda

Dig Within

The New York Times led the propaganda behind 9/11 and the 9/11 Wars. It did so by ignoring many of the most relevant facts, by promoting false official accounts, and by belittling those who questioned the 9/11 events. The Times eventually offered a weak public apology for its uncritical support of the Bush Administration’s obviously bogus Iraq War justifications. However, it has yet to apologize for its role in selling the official account of 9/11, a story built on just as many falsehoods. Instead, the newspaper continues to propagandize about the attacks while putting down Americans who seek the truth about what happened.

The New York “newspaper of record” has published many articles that promote official explanations for the events of 9/11. These have included support for the Pancake Theory, the diesel fuel theory for WTC 7, claims based on the torture testimony of an alleged top al Qaeda leader

View original post 851 more words

Fourteen Incredible Facts About 9/11

Dig Within

bush-pockets_3387322bAs the 14th anniversary of 9/11 approaches, it’s important to remind people that we still don’t know what happened that day. What is known about 9/11 is that there are many incredible facts that continue to be ignored by the government and the mainstream media. Here are fourteen.

  1. An outline of what was to become the 9/11 Commission Report was produced before the investigation began. The outline was kept secret from the Commission’s staff and appears to have determined the outcome of the investigation.
  2. The 9/11 Commission claimed sixty-three (63) times in its Report that it could find “no evidence” related to important aspects of the crimes.
  3. One person, Shayna Steinger, issued 12 visas to the alleged hijackers in Saudi Arabia. Steiger issued some of the visas without interviewing the applicants and fought with another employee at the embassy who tried to prevent her lax approach.
  4. Before 9/11, the…

View original post 661 more words

An Introduction to 911 Truth

original photo gallery: http://smu.gs/1Kp6sqm
Consider what happened to the The North Tower on 9/11/01 for a moment.
[also see: David Chandler’s commentary on The North Tower Exploding]

How can we even imagine this massive (one acre of floor space, not counting the huge central core structures) 110-storey, highly-redundant office building, could have converted itself into dust and fragments of steel, when there were only 10-13 floors above the impact zone and gravity was, supposedly, the only thing driving the destruction? The lightest part of any building is the top, which is why the towers had tapered vertical columns, that got progressively thicker the lower down they were. At their base, the larger core columns were nearly solid. What remained & surrounding areas

1100 people that were in the towers remain unaccounted for to this day. No one has explained, or even addressed how the more than 9000 human remains still “frozen for future analysis” got so degraded (from these supposed gravity-driven collapses), that DNA analysis has been unable to identify them.

NIST’s ‘investigation’ into the destruction of the Twin Towers goes up to the point where they began to fail; what they term “conditions for collapse initiation having been reached” and want us to believe everything that followed, namely the complete destruction of both towers, was inevitable, despite the large redundancy ratios built into them.

The ‘pile driver’ theory does not match observations. Even a cursory look at the “investigations” done on 911 (FEMA, The 911 Commission Report, and NIST’s reports on the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7) shows they were investigations in name only. *see analysis by David Chandler, Jim Hoffman, Steven E Jones, Kevin Ryan, and others. *NIST is a NON REGULATORY agency of the Department of Commerce.

WTC7’s implosion, –[version II] speaks for itself: asymmetrical damage caused by office fires and localized failures, cannot possibly account for the precipitous, high-speed, symmetrical collapse that occurred. One does not need to be an engineer or architect to know what happened to these buildings. The fact that no 100% steel-framed hi-rise building has ever collapsed due to fire. In well over 100 years of building these structures and having fires in them, no steel-framed hi-rise has ever come down in that manner and not a controlled demolition. The burden of proof clearly is with anyone claiming it was anything other than a controlled demolition.

One does not need to be an architect or an engineer to know what happened to those buildings. We have a good idea what happened inside of them because we know how they came down and what remained of them afterward. Paper: The Mysterious Collapse of WTC 7 by David Ray Griffin

Video:
David Chandler WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part III)
WTC7 in Freefall: No Longer Controversial
-South Tower’s Destruction

(NIST FOIA) Enhanced

Real 911 Truth:
Journal of 911Studies
Consensus 9/11 The Best Evidence Panel
911Research.wtc7.net Hidden In Plain Sight
Kevin Ryan: The NIST WTC 7 Report is False 11min video
Kevin Ryan on the Flaws in the NIST Reports. Audio Interview by Julian Charles Kevin Ryan 8/16/14
Dr. Steven Jones – 9/11 Science: A Lecture to a Worldwide University
Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Collapse? by Steven E Jones
Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth – Evidence
Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials
Kevin Ryan’s Blog
911SpeakOut.org
RememberBuilding7.org
911review.com
Scholars for 911 Truth & JusticeScientists for 911 Truth
WTC7.net
TruthMove.org

Documentaries and Lectures:
Dr Niels Harrit Interviewed
9-11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out (2011)
9-11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out (One hour version )
Jim Hoffman 9-11 Guilt: The Proof is in Your Hands (2005)
Hypothesis – Full-length Film 2011
David Chandler
Steven Jones NanoThermite 2009
Kevin Ryan Emerging Science of World Trade Center Demolitions 2009

Books:
by Kevin Ryan
THE 2001 ANTHRAX DECEPTION The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy Graeme MacQueen

Links:
A Noble Lie – The Oklahoma City Bombing 1995 I dont agree with everything in this one, I leave to people’s critical analysis to separate what is, from what is not compelling.
Waco: A New Revelation
An Introduction to the JFK Assassination
Top Secret America: Washington Post
Vanity Fair: One Nation, Under Arms By Todd S. Purdum
The Power Principle by Scott Noble

War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us To Death

Century of Enslavement: The History of The Federal Reserve

Quotables:
The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing. – Albert Einstein
There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what is not true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true. – Søren Kierkegaard<
The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is. – Winston Churchill
“The truth hurts, but the lie is killing us.” Dr Niels Harrit

How Science Died at the World Trade Center

Dig Within

Science has been misused for political purposes many times in history. However, the most glaring example of politically motivated pseudoscience—that employed by U.S. government scientists to explain the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC)—continues to be ignored by many scientists. As we pass the 10th anniversary of the introduction of that account, it is useful to review historic examples of fake science used for political purposes and the pattern that defines that abuse.

An early example of pseudoscience used to promote a political agenda was the concerted Soviet effort to contradict evolutionary theory and Mendelian inheritance. For nearly 45 years, the Soviet government used propaganda to foster unproven theories of agriculture promoted by its minister of agriculture, Trofim Lysenko. Scientists seeking favor with the Soviet hierarchy produced fake experimental data in support of Lysenko’s false claims. Scientific evidence from the fields of biology and genetics was banned in favor…

View original post 1,648 more words

On Dr Niels Harrit’s presentation of 9/11 related evidence before a Danish court

How can anyone within reach of the internet not have seen the video of WTC7’s implosion WTC7’s implosion at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11 by now? Yet this is what we hear from many people. I’m sure it is true to some degree. They must all have their heads very well hidden from reality.The sad reality is that our neighbors and loved ones are a greater threat than the deep state, because it is there

Is this interviewer blind? Fires cause gradual deformations, not freefalling/near-freefalling imploding and exploding (through their vertical axes) steel-framed skyscrapers. Clearly, neither he, nor those Danish judges, have bothered to look very closely at the most basic facts. How could they pretend to know anything about it yet deny the inescapable implications of all this data, and still expect to be taken seriously.

There is a literal mountain of well-documented and mutually supportive facts that make the official accounts of what happened to those buildings impossible. These include minute spheres of elemental iron, so prevalent that RJ Lee labeled them a ‘signature component’ of WTC dust. They make up just under 6% of the dust, a huge number. These, among numerous other strands of evidence, are direct forensic evidence of the use of thermite/thermate. There is also ample video and witness accounts of molten steel and iron at all three sites. There are thermal images taken by NASA, as well as by Bechtel’s daily helicopter flights that took surface temperature readings of the three sites, and all show extreme temperatures (up to 2800f) even weeks later. This is far above what any uncontrolled hydrocarbon fire could produce. That the fires could not be put out for 100 days is also concordant with the use of thermite because the stuff burns even underwater. The words ‘..that liquefied the steel’ are in the FEMA BPAT Appendix C.

All but the most robust metallic elements in the towers were pulverized, and their destruction exhibited explosive horizontal ejections so powerful they blasted massive multi-ton sections of core and perimeter columns for hundreds of feet in every direction, embedding some of them into the facades of neighboring buildings. 1120 people that were in the towers that morning remain ‘unaccounted for’ to this day.

It is more than a little difficult to believe the Danish judges, or anyone with even a remote interest in the subject, could remain ignorant of such a vast preponderance of evidence. The silence from the so-called ‘progressive left’ has been deafening. People like Amy Goodman, Noam Chomsky, Matt Taibbi, Rachel Maddow, Jeremy Schaill, Glenn Greenwald, -who told Luke Rudkowski, (in one of Luke’s short but brilliant, candid on-the-spot street interviews), the work he is doing ‘is very important.’ Yet Greenwald himself continues to remain silent on the matter when it comes to his own ability to speak out publicly. Even Julian Assange had disparaging words to say about ‘911 conspiracy theories.’ So what can we make of this?

The most obvious conclusion is that speaking out about 911/Anthrax Truth has become a kind of litmus test that enables us to identify legitimate journalists from those who use their voices to shield the perpetrators of these crimes, even if it is only through their silence. If a journalist does not have the courage to speak publicly about the watershed event of our time, events that future historians may well mark as the starting point of World War III, how can we take them seriously? As if anyone could convincingly pretend that the evidence is anything but conclusive.

That something so unprecedented, far-reaching and horrific can, 14 years on, remain so effectively hidden in plain sight, (never even having been properly investigated by a regulatory agency), at the very least, reveals the degree to which we are living in a top-down managed, farce of a society.

If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. -Desmond Tutu.